Interesting article
here on Evangelicals, along with most American Christians, fearing the loss of their teenagers to this present darkness of a culture we've got going. 5 years after the big 9/11 wakeup call, everyone is back to a pretty steady hedonistic lifestyle. Simply put, we're back to being selfish. If every ecosystem has a harbinger of ill health, the canary in a coal mine, the shellfish in the marsh, etc, then I'd venture to say our teenagers are our view into the future- and its a pretty bleak one. One where the needs of an individual are elevated to such new heights as to be idolatrous.
Anyway, that leads in an odd way, to my subject today, which is this ongoing tension in American Christianity between individual and community. One way I see this getting played out is in this dialougue between Evangelicals and Emergents. The Emergent Church movement has a gotten a good amount of press lately, and some of it I see as self published, but then again, I've been reading a lot of blogs- and the blogosphere is notoriously populated by postmoderns and millenials, without alot of modernists to challenge. Anyway, I stumbled upon "open source theology", an interesting site. I don't want to give it a whole review, because I don't think two visits would be any stretch make my opinion definitive, but my first impression did seem to be one of a lot of divinity school drop-outs throwing around big words. I do believe in the neccesity of such forums, where we wrestle with the clash between kingdom and culture, or celebrate the union of the same, but just because you know terms like eschatological and parousia, do they help the everyday person understand the conversation? At some point we move from dialogue to navel-gazing. Turn off the computer and go work for an hour at the soup kitchen (she says while engaging in the same behavior she decries).
But I digress. One thread was focused on the relationship between the emergents and evangelicals. A delicate knot to untie. The majority of emergents I have heard sound a lot like mainline protestant social justice folks, but ones who actually know the Bible and believe Jesus said those things. I have resonated with this message quite well, as a mainliner who desparately wishes her denomination would come to know Jesus. I am particularly struck with how most often the message seems aimed to those with a great deal of evangelical experience, trying to get them to go out and be a force of change. "You've been saved, so go and change the world." Rob Bell was making the point of differientiang between personal sin and Institutional Sin. He used Billy Graham and Martin Luther King to represent the two- Billy calling you to repent of individual sin, and MLK to get a country to repent of an institutional sin. Both important, both worthwhile, both a part of the gospel.
Its a great example. Always these two extremes that Christianity gets to walk in between- threading the needle. So, Evangelicals to me, represent that call to the personal- to a real faith, to deal with your sin, to share the process with another. There is the quote "Evangelism is one beggar telling another beggar where to find bread." And so, for me, the Emergent movement is alot about the community- about dealing with some institutionalized stuff and reimaging the entire creation- all in a communal context. Maybe Evangelicals become the capitalists, and Emergents the communists. Those are loaded words from years of contextualizing- but think of them more as you did when you first studied forms of government in 8th grade, and you'll see where I'm coming from.
So, in doing this little exercise, I was reminded of the ways in which we read scripture, and read into it, and how English fails us. So, much can be said about the community and times in which the scripture was written(big word to use here is "hermaneutical"). I do think it is of value to understand that context- it only deepens my faith to do so. As with everything though, we can go too far and spend our time only looking at what the text would have said to someone of that day, and not letting the Spirit breathe into us, and the text, and let it live and speak to us today. So that is my point of diversion with many mainline preachers. Too academic- great that this passage meant such and such to Marcus Flavius Uno, but what of its call to us today? Evangelicals rush in at this point- providing as an alternative a wealth of personal application of scripture. Here is what you need now and today.
Run in such a way as to get the prize. You are the light of the world. Work out your faith with fear and trembling. We(yes I count myself an evangelical) take all these as personal instructions and we work very hard to make our individual lives conform to an ideal of prayer, and behavior, and piety- by ourselves- in our quiet times.
But study any other language, and when you read those passages in that language, you'll see that those commands are most often in second person plural, not second person singular. The real translation of Colossians 2:17 should be
Christ in Y'all, the hope of glory. Paul was writing to whole communities, not usually to individuals. (Timothy and Titus being the exceptions). As was Peter, James, and John. So what does that mean? And can Emergents put a face on that? Something that gets beyond the post-apocalyptic-eschatology of pneumatological gobbledy-gook? Will this new call to communal living play out? Will we be better able to understand the Y'all nuances versus the individul focused approach? Will their call to communal living and journeying rise above a neo-hippie socialism? I wait to see, as I also hope fevertly so...because if a group of people can actually live out the Gospel in a real life way in the midst of a real life culture, I think the world as we known it might end...if the kingdom has, like the crest of a wave, been slowing folding into reality...then that might be an actual tsunami moment of transformation. I will keep dreaming. And restrain myself from using big, unneccesary words.